Imagine inviting someone into your home for an evening of coffee and conversation. You have high expectations of a nice experience, talking and sharing in a quiet, adult atmosphere. Suddenly there is a loud clatter and through the front door bursts a neighbor who interrupts your evening and begins disparaging your guest, calling him names and questioning his very character. Just for good measure, the intruder starts leveling personal attacks so immature in nature that if there was such a thing as disciplinary action for being insensitive and ignorant, your neighbor would be locked up and the key thrown away forever.
That's pretty much what happened Tuesday night on MyWestTexas' "Blog the Vote," when we invited several of our town's city council candidates in for a live Web cast. Users have the option of adding to the conversation by texting what we hope to be intelligent questions. We had looked forward to a civil discourse of the campaigns and issues, but were smacked down by people who frankly need a license to operate a keyboard. It was unbelievable. A total embarrassment.
Fortunately, these disruptors don't represent or outnumber the more intelligent people who number in the millions and use the Internet responsibly. Still, sometimes I wonder if we as a people are mature enough to be given the keys to such a participatory medium. Last night the answer was made clear: Not by a long shot.
Comedian Jay London's trademark line is, "You might recognize me, I'm the fourth guy from the left on the evolutionary chart." The people who busted in and interrupted our conversations last night were not quite as far along as Jay.
An outgoing mayor who is one of the most faith-filled people I've ever met, a new mayor who is a decent, honest, intelligent Christian man with a caring heart, and a woman with the best of intentions who fell short, all deserve apologies for the behavior of people online. Several people who participated in destroyed Tuesday's discourse reminded me of a bunch of fourth graders who begin yelling and screaming and picking fights, throwing paper airplanes and shooting spit wads after the teacher leaves the room. It really had to be witnessed to be believed. But if you didn't see it, count yourself among the more fortunate this morning.
It's really not confined to the discussion of last night, of course. Last week, the Jessica's Well blog began a thread about the mayor's race and although it was productive, healthy content for a good number of early posts, it devolved into name calling, back biting and some of the most meaningless conversation I've ever seen on a blog. The people who run the Well are not to be blamed for providing the platform that imploded on itself. In the Internet age, we can only give people the tools. If they continue to hammer themselves and others in the thumb, what are we to do? You can lead a commenter to water but you can't keep him from shooting himself in the foot.
Over the course of two years I have seen a number of comments that people post to online stories in hopes of sharing their views with the public. Trust me ... you would not believe the level of bigotry and outright racism that exists here. Many comments are tossed in the trash. When we have an opportunity to muzzle the hatred, we must take it.
On this blog, a simple story last week about a hard-working, compassionate Mexican villager garnered only negativity from a man who has repeatedly brandished his disdain for Mexicans like a badge of honor. Fortunately, we have been given the Ban User option for a very good reason.
It's too bad people can't reign themselves in. In their repeated showings of irrational conduct and immaturity, we only diminish a medium that, despite its many flaws, has the ability to be a great educational and informational tool. Perhaps one day we'll be able to control the flow of negativity and maximize the potential of the Web. Because we'll never be able to change people.
Recent Comments